COVES: Serving as a Science Advisor

By: Chelsea Gray
November 4, 2021
Posted in:
Est. Reading Time: 2 minutes
Our "Postcards" series shares the experiences of engineers and scientists who are taking early steps toward local engagement.
Share this with your network

Tell us about yourself.
I am an environmental science and policy Ph.D. student, studying basking shark behavior using a complex individual based model. This model will become a case study, to understand why (or why not) such models are used in conservation policy. I’m based in Virginia, but my research is based in Ireland.

What is important to you about engaging with your local government?
Despite the international nature of my research, I feel that local engagement is vital, especially when it comes to environmental issues. The success of conservation and environmental outreach is strongly dependent on local support, and local outreach is often where big scale policy changes begin.

Chelsea Gray

What did you do?
I applied for the Commonwealth of Virginia Engineering & Science Fellowship (COVES) and worked as a science advisor for a State Delegate during the summer of 2021. It was very important for me to work with someone who had a direct impact on the legislature itself and to have direct exposure to the process of policy development. I spent my summer researching issues, responding to constituent concerns, and drafting informational sheets for the office on various issues.

What happened?
The science is quite clear about the negative human health impacts of the “urban heat island” effect (a phenomenon in which man-made structures retain heat). The effects of this are most felt by low-income neighborhoods, and historical data shows that areas that were previously redlined are significantly more likely to experience the urban heat island effect. A simple but highly effective fix for this is increasing green space, which will also make Virginia cities more climate resilient. However, in Virginia, local municipalities are only allowed to preserve a certain percentage of tree canopy. The state law is explicitly clear that localities cannot exceed the percentage set in the law. In this case, the solution to increasing heat was not based in science but required a change to how the law was worded. The law has not been changed yet, but the change may be proposed in an upcoming legislative session.

What did you get out of this experience?
It showed me how complex (and rapid) policy development is. It also showed me how much power localities have in impacting environmental conservation. Despite the focus in scientific circles on ‘evidence-based policy’, this experience showed me how much language matters when it comes to policy development.

Interested in sharing your story? Tell us about a local engagement you participated in here. You can find guidance on how to craft your postcard here.

Engineers & Scientists Acting Locally (ESAL) is a non-advocacy, non-political organization. The information in this post is for general informational purposes and does not imply an endorsement by ESAL for any political candidates, businesses, or organizations mentioned herein.
Published: 11/4/21
Updated: 02/7/22
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram